Elon Musk Says OpenAI Sold Its Soul—A Jury Will Decide

Silicon Valley loves a good origin story. A small group of idealists, a bold mission, and a promise to change the world for the better. But sometimes, those stories don’t end with a feel-good IPO—they end in court.

That’s where OpenAI now finds itself.

In a lawsuit that blends billions of dollars, bruised egos, and the future of artificial intelligence, Elon Musk is taking OpenAI—and its closest partner, Microsoft—to a jury trial.

His claim? The company he helped create abandoned its nonprofit soul in exchange for profit and power.

A jury will decide in April 2026. The fallout could start much sooner.

Once Upon A Time In OpenAI

Back in December 2015, OpenAI wasn’t supposed to look anything like it does today.

Musk co-founded the organization alongside Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, and others as a nonprofit research lab.

The mission was explicit: develop artificial general intelligence safely, openly, and in a way that wouldn’t let a handful of tech giants control the future.

Musk didn’t just lend his name. He reportedly contributed about $38 million in seed funding, helped recruit talent, opened doors, and gave the fledgling lab instant credibility.

At the time, OpenAI positioned itself as the moral counterweight to companies like Google—an AI lab guided by principles, not profit.

The Breakup Nobody Forgot

By 2018, the honeymoon was over.

Musk resigned from OpenAI’s board, publicly citing conflicts of interest with Tesla and SpaceX. Behind the scenes, however, tensions over control, strategy, and direction had been building.

After leaving, Musk largely stopped funding OpenAI and later became one of its most vocal critics.

Then came the turning point: OpenAI adopted a “capped-profit” model and entered into a deep, multibillion-dollar partnership with Microsoft.

To Musk, that wasn’t evolution—it was betrayal.

From Open To Closed?

Fast forward to 2024, when Musk formally sued OpenAI, its leadership, and eventually Microsoft.

The core accusation is simple but explosive: OpenAI, he says, promised one thing and delivered another.

Musk argues that OpenAI abandoned its nonprofit, open-AI mission, built increasingly closed, proprietary systems, became economically and strategically aligned with Microsoft, and generated enormous value by doing exactly what it said it wouldn’t.

In Musk’s telling, OpenAI didn’t just drift from its mission—it misrepresented its intentions from the start.

The $100 Billion Question

Musk isn’t asking for pocket change.

In January 2026, his legal team estimated damages between $79 billion and $134 billion, based on OpenAI’s implied valuation—numbers that immediately turned heads across Silicon Valley and Wall Street.

He’s also seeking something arguably more radical: forcing OpenAI back toward its original nonprofit roots.

That’s a tall order in an industry where training frontier models requires tens of billions in compute, chips, and infrastructure.

OpenAI And Microsoft Push Back—Hard

OpenAI and Microsoft have dismissed the lawsuit as baseless and opportunistic.

Their defense rests on a few key points: Musk gave up governance and control when he left in 2018, he has no ownership stake or contractual right to OpenAI’s future value, the capped-profit structure was necessary to compete in the AI arms race, and the nonprofit OpenAI Foundation still exists and still governs the mission.

They’ve also pointed to internal records suggesting Musk himself once advocated for more commercial approaches—undercutting his fraud claims.

Microsoft, for its part, says its investments were lawful, transparent, and had nothing to do with misleading Musk.

Why This Is Going To A Jury

Despite multiple attempts to get the case thrown out, a federal judge ruled that there’s enough evidence for a jury to decide whether OpenAI misled Musk or materially deviated from its founding commitments.

That decision alone is significant.

It means OpenAI executives—including Sam Altman—are likely to testify under oath. Internal emails, strategy documents, and early conversations about profit and control could all become public.

Even a legal “win” could come with reputational costs.

Markets Are Split, Lawyers Are Skeptical

Prediction markets currently give Musk roughly a 40–60% chance of some kind of win, reflecting real uncertainty about how a jury might interpret OpenAI’s mission shift.

Legal experts, however, are far more cautious.

Most see Musk’s massive damages claim as highly unlikely to succeed. Courts tend to focus on concrete contractual rights—not moral ownership or origin stories. At best, analysts say, Musk could win a narrow, symbolic victory tied to his original contribution.

The most likely outcomes? Musk loses outright and gets nothing, a partial win with limited damages, or a ruling that acknowledges mission drift but rejects restructuring.

A nine-figure payday? Unlikely.

The Bigger Story Isn’t Musk

Zoom out, and this case isn’t really about Musk—or even OpenAI.

It’s about a fundamental tension in AI: Can you build world-changing models without becoming the very thing you set out to challenge?

OpenAI’s transformation reflects the brutal economics of modern AI. Musk’s lawsuit forces a jury—and the public—to confront whether ideals still matter once billions are on the line.

One thing is certain: when the trial begins in April 2026, OpenAI’s origin story won’t just be debated—it’ll be judged.

That's all for this week! If you found these updates useful, you'll like more from this newsletter. Get deeper dives, hot takes, and all the latest tech news delivered straight to your inbox.